Act now

Pomp and poverty


pomp-and-poverty

May 10th, 2012 11:45 AM UTC
By

Yesterday morning in the UK, the Queen’s Speech took place amidst the occasion’s usual pomp. During a lavish ceremony at the Houses of Parliament there were guards, Lords, Earls, maces, Strangers, Black Rod and a whole host of other terms that we rarely hear, some we only just about understand but all are an essential part of the tradition and workings of the “mother of parliaments”.

Queen delivering speech

Image: Parliamentary copyright/ Parliamentary Recording Unit

The Speech, which marks the State Opening of Parliament, takes place in May each year and it is the government’s opportunity to set out what legislation it intends to pass in the coming twelve months. Now, whilst the government does not have to include everything it will do in the next twelve months in the speech, if something does make it into the speech it can be taken as a definite notice of intent that that is what the government is going to do. That is why we were hoping that the speech this year would include a promise to legislate on the 0.7% target for international aid. It did not.

That isn’t to say that we aren’t pleased with what was there. Whilst the government did not promise legislation they did reaffirm their commitment to meet the target by 2013 in the speech which is good news. Meeting Britain’s aid promise will put 15.9 million children in school and help over 9 million people overcome malnutrition in the next four years.

However, it does feel like the government have missed an open goal here. The legislation is ready, it is not a long bill and it was in the manifestos of all three main political parties before the last general election and the coalition agreement. Why wait? There are plenty of people around the world who are probably wondering the same thing. ONE’s report “Small Change/Big Difference” shows the fantastic results that could be achieved if the government keeps its promise to the world’s poorest: better nutrition for 9.6 million people, safe drinking water for 17 million people, 5.8 million safe births saving the lives of 50,000 mothers, the list goes on…

The UK has long been a world leader in international development and this would be its opportunity to do so again. If the UK legislates for and meets the 0.7 target it would the first G8 country to do so; a record the government and the British public can be proud of when the Prime Minister welcomes other world leaders to the UK for the G8 in 2013.

TAGS: 0.7%, ONE, Spotlight, UK

 

  1. Jieshengsays: May 10th, 2012 3:39 PM EST

    10/05/2012 at 3:39 pm

    0.7% should NOT BE the fixation. Aid effectiveness and end aid dependency should be.

  2. Ramonsays: May 11th, 2012 11:56 AM EST

    11/05/2012 at 11:56 am

    HAPPY BIRTHDAY BONO! God bless you man, one campan, the best thing to use internet. Thank you for exist

  3. henry de graafsays: May 12th, 2012 4:59 PM EST

    12/05/2012 at 4:59 pm

    Just giving money to hungry people will change a lot of lives, but we must be sure the food actually gets into the bellies of the hungry and not in some fat cats offshore bank!
    If we can show people how to restore the land and grow crops without using expensive
    fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides, with minimal use of expensive machinery, we will be doing more
    than giving a temporary reprieve.

  4. henry de graafsays: May 12th, 2012 5:02 PM EST

    12/05/2012 at 5:02 pm

    What the Queen spends on ceremony would likely restore 200 hectares of land in subSaharan Africa.
    I’m so sick of royalty and all the news of Kate Middleton and her lavish lifestyle.

Facebook Twitter Google+

One Blog

Popular Posts This Month

About the Blog

The International ONE Blog is a daily log of the anti-poverty movement. The site is operated by ONE staff, with guest contributions from ONE volunteers, members and allies.

The content of each post and each comment represents the views of that author and does not necessarily reflect the views of ONE. ONE does not support or oppose any candidate for elected office, and any post expressing support or opposition for a candidate is not endorsed by ONE.