Act now

From L’Aquila to the Sahel


from-laquila-to-the-sahel

Jul 23rd, 2012 11:54 AM UTC
By

Let me tell you a little story.

In 2008 food prices went through the roof. The cost of bread, milk, eggs, sugar, cooking oil, meat – you name it – became so expensive for the world’s poor people – who spend nearly all they’ve got on food – they could barely afford to eat.

And so the world’s most powerful leaders came together at a summit on an island off the coast of Italy called L’Aquila in 2009 to discuss the problem. 13 countries then stepped forward and agreed to pledge a combined $22 billion over three years to help people cope with high and rising food prices.

These 13 countries were the G8 (Canada, Germany, France, Japan, Italy, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States) plus the European Commission, the Netherlands, Spain and Sweden.

$22 Billion Pledge Financial Breakdown

But here’s where this tale starts to sour. It is now 2012 and there are nearly 1 billion people who remain hungry and hindered by high food prices. There was also a famine in Somalia in 2011 and another major food crisis is brewing in the Sahel as I write this.

While there are a lot of reasons why these crises occur – drought and conflict to name a few – there’s really only one main reason why people are not resilient enough to withstand these shocks: failure to invest adequately in agricultural development and nutrition.

By most accounts, the L’Aquila promises made in 2008 have expired or will do so by the end of this year. (It’s a bit hard to give an exact date because each of the donors made pledges based on different time periods). But when they measured themselves in a self-assessment exercise call the G8 Accountability Report at the 2012 Camp David G8, these 13 countries no longer looked like heroes. They managed to disburse just 58% of the $22 billion.

And what makes this story even sadder is that these 13 countries promised to finance country investment plans if countries developed them. And over the last 3 years at least 30 country plans have been put in place, but they remain just 50% funded. Worst of all, 6 of these countries are in the Sahel.

Financing these plans wouldn’t make the crisis in the Sahel disappear, but investing for the long-term makes economic sense. By fully funding the country investment plans of the 6 crisis- affected countries in the Sahel, for instance, nearly 10 million people could be lifted out of poverty.

So what are you waiting for? Sign ONE’s Crisis in the Sahel petition and tell these world leaders to live up to their commitments and fund the UN’s humanitarian appeal in the Sahel while also supporting their plans for long-term investment in farming to help end the cycle of crisis.

TAGS: Africa, Agriculture, Food, Food security, Sahel, Thrive

 

  1. dubravkasays: Jul 24th, 2012 3:51 PM EST

    24/07/2012 at 3:51 pm

    In my opinion, what should be financed primarily in countries like these, is EDUCATION. just constantly paying for their problems is not the (only) solution. Enable these people to help themselves.

  2. Sammysays: Jul 25th, 2012 8:01 AM EST

    25/07/2012 at 8:01 am

    Maybe change that L’Aquila is an island – it’s part of central Italy, 1.5 hours away from Rome which devastated the city and surrounding villages. The G8 summit was held there to try and encourage the G8 to invest in its restoration

  3. sumonsays: Jul 30th, 2012 7:19 PM EST

    30/07/2012 at 7:19 pm

    Oh nice.I charmed to know the information.I really like its goo aspects.Its a nice information sector.NiceA

Facebook Twitter Google+

One Blog

Popular Posts This Month

About the Blog

The International ONE Blog is a daily log of the anti-poverty movement. The site is operated by ONE staff, with guest contributions from ONE volunteers, members and allies.

The content of each post and each comment represents the views of that author and does not necessarily reflect the views of ONE. ONE does not support or oppose any candidate for elected office, and any post expressing support or opposition for a candidate is not endorsed by ONE.