Policy Brief
The G20 has recognised that supporting the development of low income countries, a majority of which are in Africa, is essential to promote their objective of ‘global, balanced growth’. The Toronto G20 Summit in June affirmed the importance of achieving the Millennium Development Goals and set up Working Groups on Development and Anti-Corruption. The G20 has also collectively made a number of development related commitments, including the L’Aquila Initiative on food security, action on non-transparent financial centres, and a Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) Finance Challenge. However the donor members of the G20 must also reaffirm their commitments to help developing countries meet the MDGs.
The G20 should improve on the G8’s record of monitoring progress on the promises they made And the G20 forum must not get used as an excuse for the G8 nations to shirk their long standing development commitments. ONE is looking to the Seoul Summit for firm G20 actions on promoting development that conform to the “TRACK Principles” of aid: Transparent, Results-oriented, clear about the degree of Additionality for any financial commitments, clear about the degree of Conditionality, and monitored to ensure the promises are being Kept. There should be a commitment to report on progress during the French G20 presidency.
This briefing covers: the impact of the G20’s core agenda on African development; actions to promote inclusive growth; actions to combat corruption; actions to deliver and expand on the L’Aquila agriculture and food security promises; and actions on African representation at the G20.
If the South Korean G20 agrees to these recommendations, it will mark a shift towards a more dynamic and inclusive growth model which builds on the success of the smarter aid partnerships of recent years by investing in sustainable, well-governed growth. The strategy embodied in the Seoul Consensus could be an exciting moment of synthesis. South Korea benefited tremendously from effective aid and committed development partners which complemented its own unique development strategy. Today South Korea is living proof that it is possible to make poverty history, but also that there is no single path from poverty to prosperity.
Some of the core actions that the G20 have agreed in response to the financial crisis will affect African growth prospects. The chart below highlights what these could be and therefore the importance of the G20 considering the development dimension as part of their ongoing policy discussions:
|
|
G20 polices |
Effects of G20 actions on Africa |
|
Fiscal stimulus |
Fiscal consolidation |
Undoing G20 stimulus packages could reduce African GDP by 2.5% [1] |
|
Trade rebalancing |
More Chinese imports, fewer US imports |
Demand for African raw materials may increase more than for processed goods |
|
Flexible exchange rates |
A Chinese renminbi appreciation of 10% |
African GDP could gain 0.25% [2] |
|
Financial regulation |
Stricter capital adequacy ratios |
Lower lending owing to higher capital requirements could lower African GDP by around 1.5% [3] |
|
Trade |
Doha Round conclusion |
A modelling study suggests Africa would gain from a WTO Doha Agreement by around 0.1% of global GDP [4] |
|
Climate finance |
Provide finance, technology transfer and reduce emissions in G20 |
A modelling study suggests a possible Copenhagen deal (including technology transfer, climate finance and cuts in emission) could improve African incomes by 6% [5] |
|
Financial safety nets |
Support a financial safety net |
Support countries vulnerable to shocks |
|
Transparency in natural resource revenues |
Promote codes of conduct in G20 companies in Africa |
More transparency on how companies pay taxes in Africa will allow governments to be held to account, reducing corruption |
The G20 now has, through the Development Working Group, the opportunity to consider policies that could promote inclusive growth in Africa. Sustainable, inclusive growth requires private sector investment in skills and infrastructure. Functioning markets and job creation along with good governance are the engines of growth and self sufficiency that will lead to an escape from poverty.
Possible G20 actions as part of the G20’s development agenda pillars [6]
| Growth Area | Examples of policy issues | Possible G20 actions | How can actions be initiated? |
|
Infrastructure |
Finance and incentives for regional infrastructure development |
|
|
|
Private investment and job creation |
Promoting Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) through streamlining Doing Business indicators |
|
|
|
Human resource development |
Promote employment-relevant skills (matching efforts on demand and supply sides of the labour market) and youth –focussed transformative entrepreneurship training (to small and medium enterprises (SMEs)) and innovative business ideas |
|
|
|
Trade |
Improved market access, regional market integration and capacity to trade |
|
|
|
Financial inclusion |
Financial Inclusion Experts Group (FIEG); remittances |
|
|
|
Growth with resilience |
Risk-mitigating instruments and shock absorbers |
|
|
|
Food security |
Food price stability policies and agricultural productivity programmes |
|
|
|
Governance |
Regulatory reform, anti-corruption and a deepening of the existing tax base |
|
|
|
Knowledge sharing |
Platform for knowledge sharing |
|
|
Note: C10 = Committee of African Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors.
LICs = Low Income Countries
ILO = International Labour Organisation
The G20 is in a unique position to lead a worldwide crackdown on corruption and illicit financial flows – which have cost Africa an estimated $854bn from 1970 to 2008. (Africa Progress Report, 2010 [8])
The Anti-Corruption Working Group is a welcome addition to the G20 agenda. At the Toronto Summit there was vocal support for the United Nations Convention Against Corruption and action in areas including adopting and enforcing anti-bribery rules, stolen asset recovery, closing down tax havens and protecting whistleblowers and improving transparency in the extractive industries. The Seoul Summit should endorse practical actions on how progress can be made to beat corruption and promote transparency, for example:
In 2009, the G20 committed $22 billion to the L'Aquila Food Security Initiative through bilateral and multilateral channels. The G20 members have yet to fully clarify the details of their financial commitments and outline how they will implement the qualitative principles: adopting a comprehensive approach, promoting country-led strategies, strengthening coordination, leveraging benefits from others and delivering on a sustained, accountable commitment. The G20 have committed to addressing the needs of smallholder farmers, the position of women farmers, and the impact of climate change on agriculture - all of which are essential to improving agricultural productivity and pro-poor growth.
In Africa, country-led plans must be supportive of the CAADP process. The G20 should also take the opportunity to look beyond the L'Aquila commitment for a longer-term framework to promote sustainable agricultural development and improve food security to stay on track to meet the first MDG – to halve hunger and poverty by 2015. The Seoul Summit should:
If the G20 is to become a forum for truly global debates about growth and poverty reduction there must be more representative participation from the least developed countries (LDCs). The majority of LDCs are in Africa and the G20 should take steps to formally accommodate the voice of African countries. In the interim, institutions such as the African Union should continue to be invited and supported to participate in ministerial meetings, Summits, and their preparatory processes.
2. Op cit
3. Brahmbhatt, M. and Canuto, O. (2010) ‘Natural Resources and Development Strategy after the Crisis.’ Economic Premise Number 1 Washington, DC: World Bank.
4. Anderson, K., Anderson, W., Martin, W. and van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2006) ‘Global Impacts of the Doha Scenarios
on Poverty.’ In Hertel, T. and Winters, A. (2006) Poverty and the WTO. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Cantore et al (2009) Climate negotiations and development: how can low-income countries gain from a Climate Negotiation Framework Agreement? ODI Working Papers 312, November 2009
6. This table is derived from research conducted by ODI and the South African Institute for International Affairs for ONE.
7. New Partnership for African Development
8. http://www.africaprogresspanel.org/en/our-work/publications/annual-report-2010/