African development was again the subject of G8 discussions as world leaders gathered in Toyako, Hokkaido in northern Japan from July 7-9 for the 2008 G8 Summit. While the G8 was confronted with multiple global challenges, including climate change and a weakening global economy, the 2008 Hokkaido Summit marked an important “mid point” moment in the fight against poverty. The Hokkaido Summit came at the critical halfway point to both the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and the G8 Gleneagles promises to Africa. The G8 are dangerously behind on their landmark commitments to the region, having delivered only $3 billion of the promised $25 billion in additional assistance to Africa by 2010, according to the 2008 DATA Report.

After difficult negotiations, the G8 summit yielded small gains for the poorest. The bulk of G8 agreements on development and Africa and food security reiterated previous pledges rather than outlining new measures to get the group back on track. The G8 did announce plans for a new effort to tackle the global food crisis, though more details are needed to ensure its effectiveness and delivery. They highlighted the UN High-level meeting on the MDGs in September as an important opportunity to review progress and identify actions needed to overcome remaining challenges.

At a time when G8 credibility is at risk due to slow progress in delivering on commitments, there was a strong call for greater accountability in the G8 Communique. The G8 agreed to track progress against previous commitments in health, education, water and agriculture, as well as its compliance with anti-corruption measures.

Overall, the US, UK and Germany provided strong leadership in negotiations and have significantly increased their funding for Africa in recent years.

After the jump, the following brief overview of outcomes for Africa from the 2008 G8 Summit.

-Ben Hubbard

……

OVERALL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE

Reiteration of 2005 commitment to increase aid to Africa by $25 billion by 2010

The G8 included a reiteration of its 2005 commitment to increase Official Development Assistance (ODA) to Africa by $25 billion a year by 2010 (starting from a 2004 baseline). The G8 also recommitted to their global target of an additional $50 billion by 2010. They did not commit to an accountable timetable for delivering on these 2005 promises. The G8 also made an important acknowledgement that ODA from G8 and other donors may need to increase after 2010 and therefore beyond their current commitments.

HEALTH & INFECTIOUS DISEASES

Reiteration of 2005 commitment to universal access by 2010; new commitment to make progress on malaria

The G8 identified the remarkable successes underway in the fight against infectious diseases as a result of G8 support. The G8 stated that they intend “to honor in full their specific commitments to fight infectious diseases, namely malaria, tuberculosis, polio and working towards the goal of universal access to HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment and care by 2010.” Importantly, the G8, for the first time, provided matrices showing G8 progress in implementing past commitments to ensure accountability. In addition, the G8 committed to work through public and private sector partnerships to deliver 100 million bednets by 2010 as part of a broader effort to deliver on existing malaria commitments.

HEALTH FINANCING

Reiteration of commitment to provide $60 billion for health

The G8 reiterated their 2007 Heiligendamm commitment to provide $60 billion to fight infectious diseases and improve health systems. However, this year the G8 assigned a five-year timetable to the commitment this year. While $60 billion is a large figure, it is not dedicated to Africa or to specific health outcomes nor is it all new financing. Moreover, it does not reflect the likely increases already in the pipeline. For example, the United States Congress passes a $50 billion five-year bill to fight AIDS, TB and Malaria this summer as expected, then the US alone would fill $50 billion of the $60 billion commitment, leaving very little for other donors to contribute.

HEALTH SYSTEMS

New commitment to work toward WHO minimum health worker density

The G8 continued the increasing donor attention to building health systems as a focus of health ODA. They said, “The G8 members will work towards increasing health workforce coverage towards the WHO threshold of 2.3 health workers per 1000 people, initially in partnership with the African countries where we are currently engaged and that are experiencing a critical shortage of health workers.” The mention of the quantitative WHO endorsed baseline of 2.3 health workers per 1000 people is a firm target, but there were not financial commitments made to reach this outcome. A majority of the health portion of the communiqué was focused on health systems and a more comprehensive approach to health development. This is a departure from past G8 Summits. In addition, a separate Summit document titled the “Toyako Framework for Action on Global Health” spells out, in even greater detail, the importance of health systems strengthening in meeting G8 commitments and improving overall health. The G8 “welcomed” this contribution but its recommendations were not adopted in a binding manner.

MATERNAL & CHILD HEALTH

Acknowledgement of need to address slow progress in improving maternal and child health

A separate paragraph on maternal and child health was included in this year’s communiqué. It included recognition that many countries are seriously off-track in their progress towards meeting the MDGs on these two areas. The G8 committed to blending HIV/AIDS programs with sexual and reproductive health programs, a critical part of reducing maternal mortality.

WATER AND SANITATION

Reiteration of the Evian Water Action Plan with stronger accountability

The G8 acknowledged, on numerous occasions throughout the Communique, the cross-sectoral impact of water and sanitation and the slow pace of progress in meeting the water and sanitation MDG targets. The G8 committed to “reinvigorate” their efforts to implement the Evian Water Action Plan from 2003, in which they agreed to prioritize the water and sanitation sector within overall aid levels. Importantly, the G8 also committed to preparing a progress report on G8 efforts in the sector by the 2009 summit. Although the communiqué recognizes the International Year of Sanitation and calls upon national governments to prioritize sanitation, the G8 made no new commitments or financing targets towards scaling up access to sanitation

EDUCATION

Commitment to fill $1 billion 2008 funding shortfall for FTI endorsed countries

The G8 promised to meet the $1 billion funding shortfall for Fast Track Initiative (FTI) endorsed countries in 2008. They also committed to monitoring G8 support to the FTI in a report to be delivered at the 2009 Summit. G8 leaders identified the critical shortages of teachers in Africa and the need to focus on improving learning outcomes in conjunction with increasing access. They also said they would promote synergies between the education sector and other development sectors through, for example, school feeding programs. The G8 did not include the phrase “no country seriously committed to Education for All shall fail for lack of resources,” which marks a retreat from past communiqués.

GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY

Announced plans to establish a new global partnership on agriculture and food security

The G8 announced that since January 2008, they have collectively committed more than $10 billion, for short and long term efforts to respond to the global food price crisis. They did not provide a breakdown of this figure by donor or purpose and did not stipulate a time period over which it would be spent.

The G8 acknowledged that tackling the global food price crisis will require “leadership, ambition, and an appropriate scale of resources.” Without spelling out concrete measures, the G8 announced their intention to launch a new global partnership on agriculture by the time of the UN General Assembly meeting in September. The global partnership would coordinate the international response and ensure a comprehensive strategy to tackle food security in the medium and long term. The partnership would strengthen and build on existing international institutions and facilitate coordinated financial and technical support around country-led processes and local leadership. As part of the partnership, the G8 intends to create a global network of high-level experts on food and agriculture to provide science-based analysis on global needs and future risks.

The G8 called for open and efficient agricultural and food markets and for the removal of export restrictions on food, signaling their support for a process at the WTO that is working to put in place a set of guidelines and agreements on global trade restrictions such as export bans that prolong and aggravate rising food prices or hinder humanitarian purchases of food commodities.

The G8 provided a comprehensive outline of their intended mid-to long term response to food and agriculture, which included reversing the decline in aid and investment to the agriculture sector, fully implementing the Comprehensive Africa Agricultural Development Programme (CAADP), achieving a 6.2% annual growth rate in agriculture productivity, supporting research and development, improving infrastructure and food security early warning systems, helping countries adapt to climate change, and ensuring compatibility between policies on sustainable bio-fuel production and food security.

The G8 tasked their Experts Group to monitor the implementation of their Hokkaido commitments and continue to work with the UN-World Bank High Level Task Force on the Global Food Crisis.

TRADE AND INVESTMENT

Reiteration of previous commitments

The G8 acknowledged the impressive growth rates achieved by African countries in recent years and reiterated their support for measures that will lead to increased trade and private investment. Some of these measures include: strengthening the financial sector, improvements in domestic revenue generation, development of road and power networks, boosting agriculture productivity, supporting good governance. It also underscored the importance of the Doha Development Agenda negotiations, particularly the upcoming ministerial meeting on July 21, and committed to work urgently towards the completion of the negotiations. However, the G8 statements on trade did not reiterate the important 2005 commitment to “make trade work for Africa”. The G8 reiterated but did not add to its 2005 commitment to provide $4 billion in trade related assistance in line with the WTO Hong Kong Ministerial conference. The G8 also signaled their full commitment to implement duty-free and quota-free market access for products originating from Least Developed Countries.

GOVERNANCE AND THE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION

Reiteration of previous commitments on UNCAC and OECD Convention; support for anti-corruption measures, including StAR Initiative and Africa Peer Review Mechanism

The G8 called for ratification of the UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) by all countries and for the development of a review system to ensure compliance (Germany, Italy and Japan have still not taken action on the Convention). The G8 underscored their support for asset recovery efforts, namely the Stolen Asset Recovery (StAR) Initiative at the World Bank and called for more technical assistance to help developing countries implement the Convention and undertake asset recovery efforts. The G8 endorsed an annual accountability report that will detail actions each G8 country is taking to implement previous anti-corruption commitments.

DEBT SUSTAINABILITY

Committed to deepen aid dialogue with development partners

G8 leaders expressed their desire to deepen aid dialogues with emerging donors, especially around the issue of debt sustainability. The G8 highlighted the importance of borrowers and lenders pursuing sustainable lending practices so that the gains made from G8 debt cancellation are not wiped away.

PEACE AND SECURITY

No new commitments

The G8 reiterated their commitment to promoting peace on the continent by enhancing Africa’s peacekeeping capabilities through support of the Africa Peace Security Architecture and Africa Standby Force. Support will include training and equipment, sustainable and flexible funding for peace operations, and peace building support for humanitarian, reconciliation, stabilization, recovery and reconstruction efforts.

ZIMBABWE

Pledged to impose further measures (financial and other) against those responsible for the violence; recommended a UN envoy to support mediation efforts

In a separate statement, the G8 condemned the recent election in Zimbabwe and said they would not accept the legitimacy of a government that does not reflect the will of the Zimbabwean people. The G8 pledged to take financial and other measures against individuals responsible for the violence and also called for the appointment of a special envoy of the UN Secretary-General to report on the situation and support regional efforts to mediate between the opposition and the government.

More information:
All 2008 G8 Summit documents are available here.

You can download their report, titled, “The Time is Now: how world leaders should respond to the food price crisis,” from their website today.

A quick outline of the brief:

1) From food prices to food crisis
2) Provide immediate aid to prevent hunger and malnutrition
3) Support agriculture
4) Stop adding fuel to the fire by pushing biofuels
5) Help poor countries get a fair deal from trade
6) Get behind a ‘new deal’ for global food and agriculture policy
7) Conclusion: the time is now.

Again, all compliments of Oxfam’s great team, but I wanted to pass it along. The food crisis is going to be around for a while and there’s a lot of good information in this report.

-Virginia Simmons

One of the catches with this week’s UN food summit is that it’s not immediately clear just what deal the various heads of state and ministers assembled here are supposed to cut – and that leaves the (hundreds of) journalists here looking for story angles. Look at some of the main issues at play in the food prices issue and you start to see their problem:

Humanitarian relief. The World Food Programme’s urgent appeal for $755m needed to keep feeding the 73 million people dependent on it for help has been making headlines all spring – but now the funding gap has been plugged, thanks to a half a billion dollar donation from Saudi Arabia.

(Incidentally, it’s a mystery on a par with the Marie Celeste as to why WFP didn’t wait until the summit to announce the cash. Here in Rome, it would have been the story from the summit. As it was, the news – announced late on a Friday afternoon – sank with hardly a trace. One leading food journalist I spoke to this morning said he didn’t get the press release until two days later. You couldn’t make it up…)

Trade. Numerous policymakers have pointed to the long term importance of trade reform, and pushing ahead with the Doha Development Round. But as far as this summit is concerned, that’s off the agenda, since the Doha Round has its own, separate, negotiations.

Changing diet patterns. The growth of a global middle class eating a grain-intensive western diet is the single biggest driver of rising prices, and as I noted in another post earlier today, it raises the awesomely complex and politically difficult question of fair shares. But there’s no chance of any substantive discussion of that here this week.

Investing in agricultural supply. Everyone agrees that a ‘new green revolution’, or whatever you want to call it, will be essential given that demand is set to rise 50% by 2030. But while the UN’s High Level Task Force sets out a strong analysis in its newly published paper on elements of a comprehensive strategy, it’s hard to see what actual deal this week’s summit could cut in this area. Admittedly, several countries are likely to announce major new funding commitments while they’re here. But the amounts will have to be very big to become the story of the week.

So what does that leave? If I worked for the UN Secretary-General, I’d be putting all of my effort into persuading one or two of the really big producers who’ve imposed export restrictions on crops – like India, Russia, Kazakhstan or Argentina – to announce an easing of those restrictions. That would mark an important step forward, and represent a triumph for the UN and its Secretary-General.

But without that, it looks like the story of the week is likely to be about biofuels – where it’s hard to see any great strides towards consensus being made here in Rome. On the contrary, with the US and Brazil defending biofuels to the hilt even as others (including FAO head Jacques Diouf) fire broadsides off against feeding crops to cars, the risk is of a damaging spat. That will make for a lively story, if it becomes the angle that journalists here go for – but could also lead to all sides entrenching their positions, which would be a Bad Thing.

-Alex Evans

From BBC News.

“It is crucial that we focus on specific action,” said World Bank president Robert Zoellick.

“These initiatives will help address the immediate danger of hunger and malnutrition for the two billion people struggling to survive in the face of rising food prices.”>

Countries will be able to access money to provide food for schools and other core services as well as to buy essential items such as seeds and fertilizer.

UPDATE: See the WorldBank’s press release here.

You can also check out this post to see our petition delivery to the White House last week.

UPDATE: What David says:

Thanks for being a part of our hunger crisis campaign. Since I first wrote to you about this crisis three weeks ago, your response has been overwhelming and made this one of our most successful campaigns ever.

137,000 ONE members have signed our petition to President Bush, asking him to lead the G8 – a group of the world’s richest and most powerful countries – in taking action to alleviate the impact this crisis is having on people around the world.

Rising prices for staple foods and low crop yields for the world’s poorest farmers have created a silent tsunami that threatens to push 100 million people deeper into poverty.

The petition you signed asked for two things:

1. For the G8 to prioritize issues of global poverty, including the world hunger crisis, on the agenda of the G8 Summit this July in Japan.

2. And for President Bush to secure commitments at the G8 summit for additional resources for all types of food assistance and increased agricultural productivity in developing countries.

Last week, we delivered your petitions to the White House adding your voice to the growing call for action. I am pleased to be able to share with you some of the work that’s already being done to help end the hunger crisis.

Japanese Prime Minister Fukuda put the global hunger crisis on the agenda for the G8 summit, as part of a broad commitment to fighting global poverty. That is an important victory, because Japan is hosting this July’s G8 summit, where international commitments to fight poverty will be made.

In the United States, President Bush made an initial pledge of $200 million in American food assistance and followed that up last week with a call for Congress to approve $770 million in food assistance and investment in agricultural infrastructure in the developing world.

Getting the hunger crisis onto the G8’s poverty fighting agenda, and securing pledges of increased food assistance and investment in agricultural development adds up to a big win. It’s a testament to the power of grassroots action against even the toughest challenges global poverty presents.

Our next step is to secure commitments at the G8 Summit this summer and at other funding opportunities, for the fight against extreme poverty and global disease.

Thanks for adding your voice to the call for action to end the hunger crisis.

You, as a ONE member, drive everything we do. I look forward to continuing to work with you on this issue and many others in the months to come. Visit ONE.org to find out the latest.”

You can now see a transcript of his 3:30 PM public speech here.

Some excerpts:

In recent weeks, many have expressed concern about the significant increase in global food prices. And I share this concern. In some of the world’s poorest nations, rising prices can mean the difference between getting a daily meal and going without food…

I think more needs to be done, and so today I am calling on Congress to provide an additional $770 million to support food aid and development programs. Together, this amounts to nearly $1 billion in new funds to bolster global food security…

As America increases its food assistance, it’s really important that we transform the way that food aid is delivered. In my State of the Union address this year, I called on Congress to support a proposal to purchase up to nearly 25 percent of food assistance directly from farmers in the developing world. And the reason you do that is, in order to break the cycle of famine that we’re having to deal with too often in a modern era, it’s important to help build up local agriculture…

We believe in a timeless truth: To whom much is given, much is expected. And so therefore at home we are working to ensure that the neediest among us can cope with the rising food prices. And with the new international funding I’m announcing today, we’re sending a clear message to the world: that America will lead the fight against hunger for years to come.

Thank you very much for your interest. God bless.

Read the full transcript here.

-Virginia Simmons

“I welcome Prime Minister Fukuda’s intention to put the food crisis firmly on the agenda of the G8 summit in Japan in July, and his request that the World Bank, the United Nations, and other international institutions coordinate closely to prepare joint action. We will be pleased to support Japan as chair of the G8…

Donors must act now to support the World Food Program’s call for emergency funds to fill what is an urgent financing gap. Without this money, millions will go hungry. For them, the international system will have failed.

It will be important that as an international community we coordinate closely, minimize overlap and attack the issue from a variety of different fronts to ensure support reaches where it is needed most, and that longer-term supply issues can be fully addressed.

These short, medium and long-term issues will be a critical part of international action. But let us first raise the money to meet the most immediate needs. The world can afford this. The poor and hungry cannot.”

Read the full release on the World Banks site.

-Virginia Simmons
l

You can read an outline of the letter.

It was copied to the World Food Programme Executive Director Josette Sheeran, Food and Agriculture Organization Director-General Jacques Diouf, International Fund for Agricultural Development President Lennart Bage, International Monetary Fund Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn, and Chairperson of the Commission of the African Union Alpha Oumar Konare.

In the letter, Prime Minister Fukuda states:

“Soaring food prices are posing imminent and serious global challenges. Threat of hunger and malnutrition is increasing, and the high prices have also brought about social unrest.

As the Chair of the G8, I firmly believe that this issue must be a subject of our in-depth discussions with a strong sense of urgency at the Hokkaido Toyako Summit in July. I intend to consult with my G8 colleagues, so that the G8 could collectively send a robust message.

You can read the full outline of the letter here, and more about the world crisis here.

-Virginia Simmons

“One thing is certain, the world has consumed more than it has produced” over the last three years, he said.

Ban blamed a host of causes for the soaring cost of food, including rising oil prices, the fall of the U.S. dollar and natural disasters.

He said he would put together a special task force to help deal with the problem and called on the international community to help. He said the U.N. World Food Program plans to raise $750 million per year to help feed 73 million people in 80 countries.

“We need a real world and not the world of economic theories,” Ban said. “I will work on this right now with a sense of urgency.”

Read the full AP story here.

The shocking headlines have had our attention all week. The price of basic food staples have increased 45% in just the last nine months – and they’ve doubled in the last three years.

As we all must know – these rising prices deal a crushing blow to the world’s poorest people – people who already spend more than half of their income on food.

This weekend, World Bank President Zoellick said that this hunger crisis could “push 100 million people in low-income countries deeper into poverty” and that the effects would be equivalent of “seven lost years in the fight against worldwide poverty.”

The shortage is fueling social unrest in some of the most fragile nations around the globe. Haiti, Egypt, Niger, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Indonesia, Ivory Coast, Senegal, Mozambique, Bolivia and Uzbekistan discontent has already erupted. “For countries where food comprises from half to three-quarters of consumption, there is no margin for survival.”(Zoellick)

We have to do something. Please sign our petition to President Bush urging world leaders to take action.

-Virginia Simmons