Blog Contributor:

Laura Kelly

Removing the roadblocks from Cape to Cairo


removing-the-roadblocks-from-cape-to-cairo

Jul 5th, 2011 9:49 AM UTC
By Laura Kelly

Coffee Beans at Rwandan Trading Company

We’ve heard from a number of commentators as part of our Trade and Development blog series on the importance of helping Africa trade more with the US and with itself. Richard Gilbert of Business Action for Africa and Zenia Lewis of the Brookings Institute both talked about the need to bring down the barriers between countries and make trade quicker and easier. New research from the World Bank says trade between southern African countries accounts for just 10 percent of all their trade compared to 40 percent in North America.

Initiatives like AGOA and technical assistance from the Millennium Challenge Corporation can help build roads and improve communications — but the political will to open borders has to come from African governments themselves. They have been promising to do this for some time (they first committed to a Common Market for Africa at the Africa Union in 1970s) and have signed a myriad of overlapping free trade agreements among themselves (around 27 across the continent at the last count) but few tariffs have been eliminated and it still takes longer to transport goods between countries than practically anywhere else in the world.

(more…)

New Year’s Resolutions for Africa: What can rich countries do this year to help reduce poverty in sub-Saharan Africa?


new-year%e2%80%99s-resolutions-for-africa-what-can-rich-countries-do-this-year-to-help-reduce-poverty-in-sub-saharan-africa

Jan 11th, 2011 9:30 AM UTC
By Laura Kelly

In the ONE office, we’ve been talking about our new year’s resolutions — and our thoughts turned to resolutions that the international community could make to help Africa. Here are some of our suggestions:

Help Africa gain more from trade. Most G8 and even G20 countries offer special access to their markets for exports from the poorest countries. These could be improved through changes such as removing tariffs, expanding the range of products covered and simplifying and harmonizing trade rules. Increasing Africa’s share of world trade by only 1% of 2009 levels would be worth around $150 billion a year.

Be transparent! In order for aid to be effective, it needs to be accountable – both to the citizens whose taxes are being spent and also to those countries who are beneficiaries. By reporting on aid spending in a timely manner and in a method compatible with recipient country budget and planning systems, aid-dependent countries can better allocate their own spending and be more effective.

Save the lives of 4 million children. The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) needs additional funding beginning in 2011 so that exciting new vaccines for the 2 biggest disease killers of children (pneumonia and diarrhoea) can make it to the children who need them most. With adequate funding, GAVI estimates that it along with its partners can save nearly 4 million lives in the next 5 years. Donors should provide this funding at the June pledging conference in London and should also follow through on commitments they made in 2010 to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria.

Maximize Africa’s benefits from its natural resources. In 2011, natural resource wealth – worth ten times the value of aid to Africa – needs to be better channelled for economic and social development. This starts with making the companies that extract natural resources more transparent. Countries that have oil and mining companies listed on their stock exchanges should legislate to make those companies publish all payments made by those companies to governments. This can help civil society in Africa to hold their governments accountable for the revenue received. The US has already led the way on this. Europe should follow suit as soon as possible.

Help prevent another food crisis. Donors committed $22 billion to invest in agriculture to prevent another food crisis and help reduce poverty at the 2009 L’Aquila G8. Nearly 2 years later, only a small amount of this money has been delivered, and another food crisis is looming on the horizon. It’s imperative that donors deliver this increased spending on agriculture and improve the quality of the aid. As part of these efforts, donors must at minimum fulfil their pledges to the Global Agriculture and Food Security Programme (GAFSP) and directly invest in African-led Comprehensive African Agricultural Development Plan (CAADP) compacts.

We’d love to hear your ideas for resolutions!

From Pledges to Progress: Measuring Agricultural Development Assistance


May 19th, 2010 4:45 PM UTC
By Laura Kelly

We need to better understand how and where agricultural assistance is spent in order to make real progress on tackling hunger argue Gordon Conway and Laura Kelly:

Holding global leaders to account has never been easy. But when they come together in Muskoka, Canada on June 25-26th, G8 leaders claim they will report on their own progress on tackling global hunger. During the Italian G8 Presidency in 2009 the G8 announced the L’Aquila Food Security Initiative, pledging more than $20billion of aid over three years to agriculture and food security. Now as then we welcome these commitments. And like many others we are keen to see what progress has been made.

We believe that access to better aid data is vital on this issue. After 30 years of underinvestment in agriculture, we now have the political and financial momentum to make real progress on tackling hunger. But if governments do not deliver these new investments in a strategic and coordinated way, we risk dissipating efforts and missing a unique opportunity to deliver impacts on the ground for the one billion undernourished people governments are seeking to help.

When engaging in the complex, interdisciplinary world of agricultural development, we need a better understanding of what works. By investing time and money in better aid data now, governments will be able to better understand how their new investments correlate with progress on the ground. This will enable better partnerships in the future.

Our own work with the OECD-DAC database has shown that currently measurement and analysis of aid to agriculture is fraught with challenges. Governments classify and measure their agricultural aid in different ways. Some bilateral aid is given through budget support, making it difficult to measure what is any support goes to agriculture. Support to multilateral agencies is also hard to attribute to a particular activity. And OECD-DAC is very slow to release data – detailed data for 2008 was released in March 2010 – making timely analysis almost impossible.

We look forward to hearing from the G8 how they have performed in tackling hunger over the last year. But if they want their agriculture investments to have a lasting impact, they also need to urgently get the data systems in place to measure and monitor how and where the money has been spent.
……………………………………

Sir Gordon Conway is Professor of International Development at Imperial College London. For more information about his work, click here.
…………………………………….

Laura Kelly is Director, Policy of ONE Europe.
…………………………………….

On May 10th 2010, Imperial College and ONE hosted a joint workshop to discuss the challenges of measuring agricultural development assistance. For more information about this work, click here.

RELATED VIDEO

Share the Proof