More on the Muskoka Initiative


more-on-the-muskoka-initiative

Jun 28th, 2010 2:45 PM EST
By Nora Coghlan

As ONE’s Kimberley Hunter reported from Toronto this weekend, on Friday, Canadian Prime Minister and G8 host Stephen Harper announced that the G8 would be contributing an additional $5 billion towards maternal, newborn and child health in developing countries over the next five years. Other donors – like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Norway, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea, Spain and Switzerland – pledged $2.3 billion, bringing the total up to $7.3 billion. While this is a welcome increase, it still falls far short of the $30 billion in additional funding that experts estimate is needed to meet the Millennium Development Goals on maternal and child health by 2015.

More details on the so-called “Muskoka Initiative” were revealed with the release of the official G8 communiqué on Saturday, which included an annex outlining the initiative. Here at ONE, we were pleased to see that the initiative embraces some critical principles for long-term sustainability and effectiveness, like support for country-led national health plans and increased coherence through coordination and harmonization. Although there is a strong focus on outcomes (with an estimate from the World Health Organization and the World Bank that pledged funds will prevent the deaths of 1.3 million children and 64,000 mothers over the next five years), it stops short of setting out clear targets to meet these goals, such as supporting the training of an additional 3.5 million health care workers by 2015, a critical input to strengthening the health care that mothers and children need, especially during pregnancy, labor and the first five years of life, and an issue that 61,000 ONE members urged the G8 to support.

Moreover, in a year when G8 accountability was high on the summit agenda, the lack of clarity around individual country pledges is extremely disappointing. Although the communiqué states that the G8 will release the methodology used to define each country’s commitment and baselines, without this info it’s not clear which countries are truly delivering additional funding and which are using creative counting and hiding behind the G8’s collective commitment. It is critical that these details be made available, not only so advocates can chart the delivery of them, but also so governments and citizens in developing countries can start planning for them and make sure that the funds promised lead to lasting results for mother and children.

TAGS: 2010 G8/G20, G20, G8, Policy News, Spotlight

 

  1. Timur McPhersonsays: Jun 28th, 2010 7:30 PM EST

    June 28, 2010 at 7:30 pm

    The Muskoka Initiative is very vital to meet the true commitment and the work towards bettering mothers, newborns, and children in the developing world.

  2. Lola Schiefelbeinsays: Jun 28th, 2010 9:17 PM EST

    June 28, 2010 at 9:17 pm

    The Muskoka Initiative will make this planet a more responsible, humane place! Please continue to support it!

  3. Rustam Balochsays: Jun 29th, 2010 1:23 AM EST

    June 29, 2010 at 1:23 am

    The Muskoka Initiative will be an Excellent Step For Betterment. kindly support It.

  4. SJAFRUL BULKAINIsays: Jun 29th, 2010 5:19 AM EST

    June 29, 2010 at 5:19 am

    comment : we all have to support Muskoka’s initiative

  5. Goitom Berhanesays: Jun 29th, 2010 5:24 AM EST

    June 29, 2010 at 5:24 am

    It is a good start to meet the target MDG4&5,even if late to recognize the problem & take concrete measures.

  6. kamundi morrissays: Jul 1st, 2010 4:03 AM EST

    July 1, 2010 at 4:03 am

    We are an organization in kenya -Africa and deal with lots of programs on maternal health for young mothers and girls in the community. We really appreciate your efforts. We will be greatful if this can be extended to africa where the problem is enourmous thanks

    Morris Kamundi
    Executive Director- Kilele foundation Kenya

  7. Ambersays: Jul 23rd, 2010 10:45 AM EST

    July 23, 2010 at 10:45 am

    Although a focus on maternal and child health is important and necessary, there are some serious shortcomings to this Initiative.

    The G8 Communique contains only a vague reference to “enabl[ing] access to modern methods of family planning by an additional 12 million couples”.

    Although this represents a more tangible commitment to family planning services than was initially offered by the Harper government, more detail is required. Every year, 70 000 women die from unsafe abortions (14% of maternal deaths). For this reason, funding for SAFE abortion services is necessary in any maternal health plan.

    In 2007, ten African leaders called for legislation on safe abortion on the continent. Approximately 36,000 women in Africa die from unsafe abortions every year — mostly because safe abortion is unavailable to them.

    The Communique does not specify whether abortion will be included, and does not offer any specifics about how this contraception will be offered. The Harper government has made drastic cuts in funding to the International Planned Parenthood Federation…now it starts preaching about maternal health? It claims to support the well-being of women and children after eliminating the plan for a multi-million dollar childcare plan put forward by its LIberal predecessors? What a contradiction.

Leave a Comment

 

Name (required)

 

Mail (will not be published) (required)

 

Website

 

Email me when someone else comments on this post.

One Blog

Popular Posts This Month

About the Blog

The ONE Blog is a daily log of the anti-poverty movement. The site is operated by ONE staff, with frequent contributions from volunteers, members and partner organizations.

The ONE Blog updates readers daily with the latest in global development news and analysis and what ONE members and our partners are doing around the world to influence world leaders in the fight against global poverty.

The content of each post and each comment represents the views of that author and does not necessarily reflect the views of ONE or ONE Action. ONE does not support or oppose any candidate for elected office, and any post expressing support or opposition for a candidate is not endorsed by ONE.