It’s all about adaptation


Oct 21st, 2009 10:30 AM EST
By Pooja Gupta

Last week Senators Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and Bob Corker (R-TN), members of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on International Development, Foreign Assistance, Economic Affairs and International Environmental Protection held a hearing on the Impacts of Climate Change in the World’s Most Vulnerable Nations.

The hearing included testimony from Reverend Jim Ball from Evangelical Environmental Network, David Waskow from Oxfam America, Dr. Kenneth Green from American Enterprise Institute, Peter Driscoll from ActionAid USA, and Gen. Charles Wald from CAN Military Advisory Board. The witnesses discussed the urgent need for scaled-up adaptation financing for developing countries and how to best organize such financing.

Participants agreed that financing for climate adaptation is urgent: Driscoll commented that there is no viable alternative to investing in a climate adaptation fund. Senator Corker noted the importance of streamlined funding to eliminate any wastefulness. Current climate legislation, he added, does not adequately address the problem.

Senator Menendez in his opening statement,outlined 4 key reasons why an adaptation fund is necessary, many of which were echoed by the witnesses:

  1. National Interest: Strong adaptation financing gives the U.S. better positioning in international climate negotiations.
  2. National Security: Increasing numbers of climate refugees will lead to greater competition over scarce resources, and in turn causing instability and conflict in already unstable parts of the world.
  3. Ethics: A fund aimed at helping the world’s poorest people is “the right thing to do.”
  4. Economic Growth: An international adaptation fund fosters economic security by helping local businesses and workers.

The participants emphasized that the U.S. must designate significant and meaningful resources to help the world’s poorest people take on the effects of climate change.

TAGS: Climate and Development, Policy News

 

  1. Douglas Courtneysays: Oct 21st, 2009 12:05 PM EST

    October 21, 2009 at 12:05 pm

    “Participants agreed that financing for climate adaptation is urgent: Driscoll commented that there is no viable alternative to investing in a climate adaptation fund”

    How can there be no alternative to investing in a climate adaptation fund? This statement refers to $ that one will donate from there bank account but at the same time one invests his or her time to be an active member to help environmental change. The statement above doesn’t make sense to me because EVERYONE in the WORLD can make a change through their own contributions whether it be financial, blogs, word of mouth, working for ONE and other charitable causes that focus on the same issues to name a few.

    Douglas Courtney
    10/21/2009

  2. Sam Boxsays: Oct 22nd, 2009 12:52 PM EST

    October 22, 2009 at 12:52 pm

    Climate change adaptation has not received nearly enough attention in Congress. Without serious action on the hill, the U.S. will face national security threats as the rest of the world- this is an excellent article about why:
    http://blog.psaonline.org/2009/10/02/adapting-along-the-road-to-copenhagen/

Leave a Comment

 

Name (required)

 

Mail (will not be published) (required)

 

Website

 

Email me when someone else comments on this post.

One Blog

Popular Posts This Month

About the Blog

The ONE Blog is a daily log of the anti-poverty movement. The site is operated by ONE staff, with frequent contributions from volunteers, members and partner organizations.

The ONE Blog updates readers daily with the latest in global development news and analysis and what ONE members and our partners are doing around the world to influence world leaders in the fight against global poverty.

The content of each post and each comment represents the views of that author and does not necessarily reflect the views of ONE or ONE Action. ONE does not support or oppose any candidate for elected office, and any post expressing support or opposition for a candidate is not endorsed by ONE.