Stimulus Package for Sub-Saharan Africa


Mar 26th, 2009 9:26 AM EST
By Mikiko.Imai

New research commissioned by ONE found that investing $50 billion in a stimulus package for Africa would have real benefits both for Africa, and for the rest of the world, increasing global income by $250 billion over the next ten years. This research reinforces our main message to the G20 leaders ahead of their Summit in London next week — that they must include the poorest in any global solution to the current crisis, both because they will be hardest hit, and also because their economic growth can be part of the long term solution. The main findings of the research were:

  • As a result of the global financial crisis, sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) will lose approximately $ 40 – 50 billion in 2008-2009.
  • A $50 billion stimulus package for SSA will have positive effects on global trade, and would increase world GDP by 0.1% in 2009-2010. This is equivalent to an increase of $44 billion worldwide, and of this, approximately 15% or $ 6 billion benefits the world outside SSA.
  • If the $ 50 billion was used for productive investment in SSA infrastructure, world income will increase by $ 250 billion in 10 years, with much of it in sub-Saharan Africa, and around $20 billion in the rest of the world.
  • In 2009 alone, US and Chinese exports would increase by about $1.4 billion; German exports would increase by about $1.9 billion and UK exports by $ 0.7 billion.
  • A $50 billion stimulus in SSA will offset more than 85% of the impact of global financial crisis on GDP growth in SSA in 2009 and 2010
  • If this stimulus is spent on consumption like income transfers and social safety net programs like cash-for-work or school feeding programs families will feel less stretched by income losses, and incomes could increase by 4% in 2009 and a further 1% in 2010.
  • If the stimulus goes to productive investment, in addition to the abovementioned short term effects, there is a long-run positive impact on the level of economic output in SSA, which remains about 1.5% higher. Further, the stimulus on infrastructure could have a further sustained increase in output by an additional 1%.

The research was carried out by Overseas Development Institute (ODI) and the National Institute of Economics and Social Research, ahead of the G20 Summit held in London on 2 April. The research serves as a backbone our policy asks that we’ve put forward to G20 leaders. In the next few days, we’ll be highlighting some of the key issues we’re hoping to see addressed during the G20 Summit in London next week.

-Mikiko Imai, ONE Policy Analyst

TAGS: Financial Crisis, G20, G20 London 2009, Policy News

 

  1. Debbie Ksays: Mar 26th, 2009 7:45 PM EST

    March 26, 2009 at 7:45 pm

    Thanks Mikiko for this information – I hope that all of us ONE members will keep this info for our future use in our advocacy for the world’s poorest people.

    Very honestly, we are going to have to GET MORE INVOLVED in our advocacy if we are going to see the progress that has been made in some of the world’s poorest areas continue. In this world economic crisis, it will be harder to get the government of the richer nations to fulfill their promises to the poorest nations – unless we INCREASE OUR VOICES on their behalf.

    I hope that we do.

    ALWAYS FOREVER, ONE – debbie
    http://www.myspace.com/mulago

  2. Masi. Lsays: Mar 27th, 2009 4:09 PM EST

    March 27, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    This research is indeed very informative and deserves a strong and resolute approach to all the challenges it brings out.However, I am of the view that, for as long as leaders from the “rich” nations do not include counter-parts from Africa at their round table meetings such as G20 summits, this and many other silent causes will forever just be a global trade mark for talk and no work.The job is in engaging the continent that is often at the centre of their direct activities.If africa does not have a place or indeed fora on which to give its views, all the aid and loans will amount to nothing. countries like Zambia where i come from,until recent months was making very study but encouraging economic, social and political development. I stand to be argued on this view that democracy still has a long way before it is accepted by the crop of leaders we have.The problem is not Aids, Malaria, water or Laws, it is the ability to transform these promises into actual realities on the rich parts of the world. but they instead seem on one hand, to be giving genuine assistance while on the other, making aliances with these african leaders.aliances which often bring africa back to zero year in year out.no matter the compaign work done. a long time saying is:”if you want to hide anything from an african,put it in writing.a book perhaps”. the problem is the leadership qualities and styles and relations with rich nations.

Leave a Comment

 

Name (required)

 

Mail (will not be published) (required)

 

Website

 

Email me when someone else comments on this post.

One Blog

Popular Posts This Month

About the Blog

The ONE Blog is a daily log of the anti-poverty movement. The site is operated by ONE staff, with frequent contributions from volunteers, members and partner organizations.

The ONE Blog updates readers daily with the latest in global development news and analysis and what ONE members and our partners are doing around the world to influence world leaders in the fight against global poverty.

The content of each post and each comment represents the views of that author and does not necessarily reflect the views of ONE or ONE Action. ONE does not support or oppose any candidate for elected office, and any post expressing support or opposition for a candidate is not endorsed by ONE.