This week we’ve been keeping you posted about the crisis situation in Zimbabwe and mounting international pressure on President Robert Mugabe to step down. Despite a staggering cholera epidemic sweeping Zimbabwe, Mugabe continues to deny the magnitude of the epidemic, adding further chaos to the growing crisis. Today the New York Times published a fascinating and insightful piece on where things currently stand.
Excerpts below, full piece here
The outbreak is yet more evidence that Zimbabwe’s most fundamental public services — from water and sanitation to public schools and hospitals — are shutting down, much like the organs of a severely dehydrated cholera victim.
Zimbabwe’s once promising economy, disastrously mismanaged by President Robert G. Mugabe’s government, has been spiraling downward for almost a decade, but residents here say the free fall has gained frightening velocity in recent weeks. Most of the nation’s schools, which were once the pride of Africa, producing a highly literate population, have virtually ceased to function as teachers, whose salaries no longer even cover the cost of the bus fare to work, quit showing up.
In a country that already lays claim to the terrible distinction of having the second highest proportion of orphans in the world — one in four children has lost one or both parents — the closure of schools and hospitals is hitting these most vulnerable children mercilessly.
-Chris Scott
December 15, 2008 at 5:37 am
This is teriable to see how the people are suffering in Zim it is such an amazing country and thus so sad to see how it is falling apart.
December 15, 2008 at 1:54 pm
Africa en general and Zimbabwe in this case exist amidst terrible suffering. Now is the time to expand our efforts to create real assistance and a path to hope and prosperity.
Perhaps a new global perspective in needed from our foreign policy leader, moving up from violence and greed to higher more transcendental pursuits…
December 16, 2008 at 1:07 am
So Lance, what you are saying is that our foreign policy leader is currently violent and greedy and needs to move into a higher “plain” of thinking? I’d really like to see you expound on that concept.
What about the next administration? Will they also be violent and greedy (maybe just greedy) if forgein policy dictates that the money that was so foolishly promissed isn’t given?