Where They Stand


Oct 24th, 2008 2:21 PM EST
By Chris Scott

America.gov this week featured two articles outlining and detailing each US presidential candidate’s policies in regards to combating poverty and disease in Africa. Each article features a major campaign surrogate discussing his respective candidate’s plans—Howard Wolpe for Obama, Herman J. Cohen for McCain. Both are rather illuminating and definitely worth the read.

Excerpts below, full Obama piece here, full McCain piece here

A McCain administration would place even more emphasis on promoting private-sector economic development in Africa, Cohen said.

“The Millennium Challenge Corporation is very strong on private-sector [development], and I think you will see the United States Agency for International Development moving to finance even more private-sector activity to help even more Africans themselves become investors,” he predicted. “Now that Africa is becoming more open to the private sector, they need the infrastructure to make it work. “

An Obama presidency will “greatly facilitate the diplomacy required to try to make some progress on these difficult issues,” such as the humanitarian crisis in the Darfur region of Sudan or the political situation in Zimbabwe.
In the long term, Wolpe said, the central challenge facing Africa is the building of cohesive states. An Obama administration would be particularly focused on helping Africans search for common ground and eliminate conflict across the continent, he predicted. “Unless you can tackle that issue, the prospects for long-term sustainable economic development will be constantly compromised,” he said.

-Chris Scott

TAGS: ONE, ONE Vote 08, Policy News

 

  1. Michael D Kerrigansays: Oct 25th, 2008 4:46 PM EST

    October 25, 2008 at 4:46 pm

    “A McCain administration would place even more emphasis on promoting private-sector economic development in Africa,” Cohen said.
    More of the same, I would say. Do African countries still have raw materials that we have not yet stolen?
    Support of private-sector economic development in developing countries has created human suffering for those countries inhabitants and untold riches for the World’s multi-national corporations.
    I urge everyone who wishes to promote a One World perspective to read “Shock Doctrine: the Rise of Disaster Capitalism” by Naomi Klein.
    The World needs more humanity and less greed.

  2. A.B.says: Oct 25th, 2008 10:36 PM EST

    October 25, 2008 at 10:36 pm

    By the world needing more humanity, do you mean diplomatic talks? do you think Obama is the person to restore our humanity? I’m curious how he intends to peaceably eliminate conflict across the continent of Africa. It sounds great, I’m just wondering how those words translate into action. I’m admittedly skeptical. I just wonder how the leftwing illuminati foreign policy will play out.

  3. Michael D Kerrigansays: Oct 26th, 2008 1:59 PM EST

    October 26, 2008 at 1:59 pm

    When I say more humanity and less greed I mean helping the people of the developing world, not manipulating them and selling off their natural resources and public works projects to multinational corporations. Democracy and unfettered free market are not synonymous.

Leave a Comment

 

Name (required)

 

Mail (will not be published) (required)

 

Website

 

Email me when someone else comments on this post.

One Blog

Popular Posts This Month

About the Blog

The ONE Blog is a daily log of the anti-poverty movement. The site is operated by ONE staff, with frequent contributions from volunteers, members and partner organizations.

The ONE Blog updates readers daily with the latest in global development news and analysis and what ONE members and our partners are doing around the world to influence world leaders in the fight against global poverty.

The content of each post and each comment represents the views of that author and does not necessarily reflect the views of ONE or ONE Action. ONE does not support or oppose any candidate for elected office, and any post expressing support or opposition for a candidate is not endorsed by ONE.