Biden-Lugar Amendment, Sponsor Count - 32 and Rising!
March 13th, 2008 at 10:49 am | posted by John Ryan7 new sponsors!
The momentum is really starting to build. We’ll be following developments throughout the day on the blog. We expect the Senate to vote on the legislation, which would restore $4.1 billion for the international affairs budget, today or tomorrow.
If you don’t see both of your state’s senators below then, call them - at 202-224-3121 - now
Sen. Biden (D - DE)
Sen. Bingaman (D - NM)
Sen. Bond (R - MO)
Sen. Boxer (D - CA)
Sen. Brown (D - OH)
Sen. Cantwell (D - WA)
Sen. Cardin (D - MD)
Sen. Clinton (D - NY)
Sen. Coleman (R - MN)
Sen. Collins (R - ME)
Sen. Corker (R - TN)
Sen. Dodd (D - CT)
Sen. Dole (R - NC)
Sen. Durbin (D - IL)
Sen. Feingold (D - WI)
Sen. Feinstein (D - CA)
Sen. Hagel (R - NE)
Sen. Isakson (R - GA)
Sen. Kerry (D - MA)
Sen. Mikulski (D - MD)
Sen. Leahy (D - VT)
Sen. Levin (D - MI)
Sen. Lugar (R- IN)
Sen. Martinez (R - FL)
Sen. Menendez (D - NJ)
Sen. Obama (D - IL)
Sen. Schumer (D - NY)
Sen. Smith (R - OR)
Sen. Snowe (R - ME)
Sen. Sununu (R - NH)
Sen. Vitter (R - LA)
Sen. Voinovich (R - OH)


March 13th, 2008 at 11:03 am
Good to see that Senator Clinton listened to my advice and signed on to this amendment. (smile)
Thanks for the updates - keep them coming!
ONE HERAT, ONE HOPE, ONE LOVE - debbie
March 13th, 2008 at 11:04 am
So there’s no misunderstanding - I meant to say “ONE HEART”.
AS ONE, debbie
March 13th, 2008 at 11:46 am
We got Sen. Feingold, now come on Sen. Kohl - what are you waiting for???
Thank you Senator Feingold for taking our calls and doing the right thing.
March 13th, 2008 at 1:13 pm
Don’t know how much of a difference it makes but Sen. Cardin and Sen. Mikulski are from Maryland which is MD not MA.
March 13th, 2008 at 1:52 pm
Thanks Jen.
Fixing now. Thanks for letting me know!
March 13th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
So glad Boxer signed the bill today. I saw her name wasn’t on there last night and was so mad.
March 13th, 2008 at 5:23 pm
Mr. McCain still not on? Although I don’t support him politically it’s unfortunate that there must be one more reason I don’t agree with having him as president.