http://www.one.org/blog/2007/11/13/on-the-record-on-your-website/ Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:41:39 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://www.one.org/blog/2007/11/13/on-the-record-on-your-website/#comment-564122 зaйкa Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:27:41 +0000 http://www.one.org/blog/2007/11/13/on-the-record-on-your-website/#comment-564122 Это прям в точку!!! По другому и не скажешь! :) Это прям в точку!!! По другому и не скажешь!

]]> http://www.one.org/blog/2007/11/13/on-the-record-on-your-website/#comment-528347 Scott Simpson Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:48:47 +0000 http://www.one.org/blog/2007/11/13/on-the-record-on-your-website/#comment-528347 Why are we only shooting for 40,000 signatures? I remember just over a year ago we were able to generate 200,000, which is still less than 10% of those who have signed up to support ONE. It also seems that we are not signing up more people as quickly as we were early on. Maybe using committed volunteers would help. You could set up an e-mail tree of sorts. Depending on the size of the state you could have one or more state volunteers, then two or more below that person until you had each volunteer responsible for maybe 100 or so e-mail address. People who sign up people can also make sure that those who signed up have made it into the system. Just make a copy of the sign up sheet before sending it in. Why are we only shooting for 40,000 signatures? I remember just over a year ago we were able to generate 200,000, which is still less than 10% of those who have signed up to support ONE. It also seems that we are not signing up more people as quickly as we were early on. Maybe using committed volunteers would help. You could set up an e-mail tree of sorts. Depending on the size of the state you could have one or more state volunteers, then two or more below that person until you had each volunteer responsible for maybe 100 or so e-mail address. People who sign up people can also make sure that those who signed up have made it into the system. Just make a copy of the sign up sheet before sending it in.

]]>