InterAction interaction


Nov 2nd, 2007 1:59 PM UTC
By Virginia Simmons

Todd Shelton, Suzanne Kindervatter, Cherri Waters and Laia Grino, from the umbrella organization InterAction, just came by the ONE DC office to host a brown bag about their new Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) Report.

The report looks at the U.S.’s current contribution toward meeting the MDGs. The entire assessment is worth reading, but one item that really stands out to me is on page 62.

That page lists the 20 countries that received the most U.S. aid in 2006 and then goes on to list the 20 poorest countries in the world in 2006. Critically, only four of these countries overlap: Ethiopia, Liberia, Rwanda and Uganda.

(The full lists are below. All stats are from the U.S. State Department.)

20 Top Recipients of U.S. Aid in 2006 (US$ millions)

1. Israel $2,495.3
2. Egypt $1,779.3
3. Iraq $1,636.8
4. Afghanistan $1,010.8
5. Sudan $906.1
6. Pakistan $762.9
7. Columbia $580.3
8. Jordon $512.4
9. Ethiopia $329.4
10. Kenya $322.2
11. Uganda $246.2
12. South Africa $227.6
13. Haiti $225.7
14. Nigeria $180.4
15. Zambia $168.9
16. Indonesia $157.2
17. Liberia $156.0
18. Tanzania $154.0
19. West Bank & Gaza $153.3
20. Peru $144.3

20 Poorest Countries – each listed with the amount of U.S. aid received in 2006 in US$ millions.

1. Burundi $25.5
2. Congo, Dem Rep. $92.7
3. Ethiopia $329.4
4. Liberia $156.0
5. Guinea-Bissau $0.1
6. Malawi $50.0
7. Eritrea $2.8
8. Niger $23.2
8. Rwanda $95.3
8. Sierra Leone $29.5
11. Nepal $35.6
11. Chad $30.5
11. Uganda $246,2
14. Mozambique $130,8
15. Takijistan $40.4
15. Gambia $5.2
17. Madagascar $40.7
18. Central African Rep. $0.7
18. Togo $2.8
20. Tanzania $154.0

You can download the whole report, including a color-coded world map of the above, here.

UPDATE: See the map below.

Key
Red=Top Recipient of U.S. aid
Yellow= Poorest country (by GNI capita)
Blue= Poorest countries that are also top recipients of U.S. aid

MapWeb

TAGS: Foreign Aid, InterAction

  1. Debbie Ksays: Nov 4th, 2007 2:11 PM EST

    November 4, 2007 at 2:11 pm

    Thanks Virginia for this VERY IMPORTANT info about where the world stands currently on the fulfillment of the MDG’s by 2015.

    It is exactly info like this which we can use to further our own awareness of the details of what is currently being done and what more needs to be done to truly make extreme poverty history.

    I will use the info contained in this report many times in the future.~

    Take very good care, my dear friends at ONE. Blessings for you and yours always.

    AS ONE, debbie :)

  2. metapedesays: Nov 5th, 2007 3:53 AM EST

    November 5, 2007 at 3:53 am

    These two lists certainly reveal how significantly politics drives US distribution of aid to other nations, but there’s a much larger issue that’s missed altogether by policies on foreign aid as expressed in these kinds of reports, and practiced by well-meaning organizations such as ONE.

    The earth’s resources are being stretched to their very limits trying to sustain 6 billion humans. Distributing wealth more equally will raise the standards of living of the world’s poor, but only for a short time.

    Conservative estimates project that the human population will rise to 9 billion by the year 2050, and the earth simply will not be able to support an acceptable standard of living for many millions of people – no matter how evenly the world’s wealth is distributed. And you can be certain that when water and food become truly scarce, the privileged and wealthy of the world will go to great lengths to claim what’s left for themselves. The gap between the haves and the have-nots will become wider than you can imagine.

    The human population rises by 1 million every 4 days, and there simply can be no meaningful solution to the poverty problem that does not include family planning and restraints on population growth.

RELATED VIDEO

Share the Proof