Yesterday, the Washington Post ran an editorial in support of the Millenium Challenge Corp, or MCC. The MCC initiative was announced in 2002 by President Bush and is designed to be an economic development program that ensures accountability from the recipient government. If a nation wishes to have access to the initiative’s funds, it must first meet strict standards of governance and sign a detailed contract that requires certain benchmarks to be met for each successive year of the 5 year compact. MCC is often used as an example in the development advocacy camp of an aid program which demands accountability and rewards transparent governments that seek to meet their peoples’ needs.
Unfortunately, this relatively new program is facing serious obstacles on Capitol Hill. It has very little to show for its funding-to-date, but MCC advocates point out that this is to be expected due to the program’s emphasis on conducting due diligence before awarding grants, and letting recipient country councils decide democratically what the nation’s priorities should be requires a bit more patience from lawmakers.
The Post describes the predicament:
The administration asked for $3 billion for the MCC in its fiscal 2008 budget. House appropriators have cut that to $1.8 billion, about what the MCC got last year, while Senate appropriators have gone even lower, to $1.2 billion, a figure that the MCC says will cripple its ability to make new agreements with countries that have recently qualified for its programs. One benefit of the Millennium Challenge is that it creates an incentive for poor countries to improve their practices and procedures, but that could be lost if the impression spreads that the United States is pulling the plug.
July 17, 2007 at 11:33 pm
Thank you very much, Alan, for reposting this VERY IMPORTANT editorial support from one of the country’s most prestigious newspapers for the MCA.
The MCA is a wonderfully creative approach to ending extreme poverty and establishing good governance standards in countries that need a little support in their efforts towards democracy.
From its conception almost five years ago, it has been consistently underfunded and not given the support it needs from Congress to succeed.
With this support from the Washington Post, let us redouble our efforts to MORE STRENUOUSLY SUPPORT THE FULL FUNDING OF THE MCA in Congress.
As our friends at (RED) say – WE ARE THE PEOPLE THAT WE’VE BEEN WAITING FOR!
If we don’t speak up for the MCA – who will?
Take very good care of each other, everyONE. Blessings abound – just look around.
ALWAYS FOREVER, ONE – debbie
July 18, 2007 at 5:06 am
Wasn’t a concern pipeline funding, those funds awaiting satisfaction of due dilegence but not yet spent from the budget? it could give an appearance of slow progress if just looking at a spreadsheet. especially if the country’s council is the decision-making body on the priorities, on the development of practices and procedures. equiping and empowering them in lieu of just aid or worse colonization. seems there has to be a way to document these pipeline funds as designated if not spent, sustainable development issues are going to be a slow process. but like noted, it may be a wakeup call, to streamline any redtape and bulky procedures . . . it is a relatively new corporation and deserves an assessment and alignment period.
thanx for posting this link. i hope things are ironed out by the next round of budget requests.
stay close,
sammi =)